This is the essay commended by judges from Newnham College, Cambridge. I am delighted to share with you this work that took me almost a month to write and far longer to research. I loved the experience of writing this essay and immersing myself in this fascinating topic.
However, it is important to note that, since this was a 2500 word academic essay, it does make for heavier reading than my previous articles written specifically for this blog.
So brew some tea, find a comfortable reading nook, and settle in for this comprehensive exploration of the field of medical scanning from its origins over a century ago to its potential for the coming decades.
PART I : ORIGINS AND X-RAYS
The disciplines of engineering and medicine have long been intertwined, with physics concepts supporting the development of diagnostic tools and clinical demands fuelling exciting innovations in engineering.
Scanning devices for medical applications, all of which consist of an emitter and sensor, lie at the very heart of the intersection of these disciplines. Since its inception, over a century ago, this technology has been constantly evolving with new developments.
Origins
In a darkened laboratory in Würzburg, Germany (1895), an eerie glow emanating from a screen behind his cathode ray tube propelled Wilhelm Röntgen to discover invisible rays. These rays were capable of not only penetrating the heavy black paper insulating the Crookes tube but even Röntgen’s own skin. Astonished by his discovery of “a new kind of ray”, Röntgen began to experiment with the penetrating abilities of the x-ray to produce one of the first radiographs: his wife’s hand adorned with her engagement ring.
Shocked by the sight of the internal structures of her own hand, she reportedly gasped, “I have seen my death”. Despite such a macabre initial critique, x-rays captivated the world’s attention and optimism for their applications; Röntgen’s moment of serendipity gave rise to the ceaselessly evolving field of medical imaging.
X-Ray Modality Technology
X-rays are passed through the patient and are absorbed, to varying degrees, by different tissues in their body. In indirect flat-panel detection, unabsorbed x-ray photons are transmitted through the body and strike caesium iodide crystals in the first layer of the detector. The crystals scintillate when excited by radiation – emitting flashes of visible light proportional to the energy of the x-ray photons. Amorphous silicon photodiodes in the detector’s second layer transform light into electrical charges to produce digital images.
X-Rays and Cancer
X-rays play an essential role in mammography; pre-cancerous breast tissue contains clusters of microcalcifications (minor calcium hydroxyapatite deposits) which act as major indicators of accelerated cell division. Microcalcifications can go undetected in biopsies. However, in x-ray scans, these deposits are clearly revealed as bright white specks due to their very high x-ray absorption – enabling early detection.
CT Scan
The humble x-ray also forms the basis of the revolutionary multisection CT scanner (a scanning device introduced in 1992 that aims a narrow beam of x-rays at the patient in a complete spectrum of angles); this device outputs multitudes of cross-sectional ‘slices’ (tomographic images) which can be digitally ‘stacked’ to produce three-dimensional models. The technique improves both diagnostic accuracy and spatial resolution in the Z axis due to the creation of thinner tomographic slices. This also reduces the risk of partial volume artefact formation (imaging errors which occur when tissues with varying thickness and radiation absorption are in close proximity).
EOS Scan
The latest x-ray modality technology addresses a major drawback of CT scanning: its significant radiation exposure. The EOS scanner, developed in 2007, is a vertical scanner consisting of two pairs of perpendicular radiation sources and detectors. This allows for precise 3D reconstruction as well as imaging of the skeletal system in its natural weight-bearing posture. This innovation helps clinicians identify and diagnose subtler issues which are only apparent in the patient’s skeletal system in the context of its typical load-bearing alignment (as opposed to its relaxed alignment when the patient is lying down in a CT scanner).
The implementation of revolutionary particle physics technology allows high-resolution (254 μm) radiographs to be taken with significantly less radiation exposure than CT scanners. The EOS scanner uses a proportional multiwire chamber (first developed by the Nobel Prize winner Georges Charpak) which enables extremely sensitive detection of even single x-ray photons – allowing a significant reduction in x-ray exposure without compromising the resolution.
This unique aspect makes it particularly suited for monitoring scoliosis in adolescents. Since scoliosis is eight times more prevalent and more severe in females than in males, adolescent girls are typically exposed to excessive radiation from the multiple CT scans (up to 5 per year) necessary to assess the progression of this condition. High level of radiation exposure, especially during a critical phase of rapid growth, increases the risk of developing cancer; growing breast tissue is highly sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of ionising radiation which cause a 69% increase in breast cancer incidence.
The EOS scanner, with its significantly lower radiation exposure, is proving to be vital in limiting the risk of cancers whilst safely monitoring scoliosis.
The figures quoted in this essay have been meticulously researched and documented. Below is the bibliography for this section of my essay:
“History of Radiography.” NDT Resource Centre, National Science Foundation,
https://www.ndeed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Introduction/history.htm [Last Accessed: 28 Jan 2019]
“X-Ray.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation Inc., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray [LastAccessed: 28 Jan 2019]
Cruz, Robert. “Digital radiography, image archiving and image display: Practical tips.” Canadian Veterinary Journal, 49.11 (2008): 1122-1123. PMC. Web. [Last Accessed: 04 Mar 2019]
Wang, Zhentian, et al. “Non-invasive classification of microcalcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography.” Nature Communications 5 (2014). Nature. Web. [Last Accessed: 01 Mar 2019]
Rydberg, Jonas et al. “Multisection CT: Scanning Techniques and Clinical Applications.” RadioGraphics 20.6 (2000): 1787-1806. RSNA. Web. [Last Accessed: 30 Jan 2019]
Bell, Daniel, and Vikas Garg et al. “Partial volume averaging (CT artifact)” Radiopedia, Radiopedia, https://radiopaedia.org/articles/partial-volume-averaging-ct artifact-1?lang=gb [Last Accessed: 30 Jan 2019]
Illés, Tamás, and Szabolcs Somoskeöy. “The EOS (TM) imaging system and its uses
in daily orthopaedic practice.” International Orthopaedics 36.7 (2012): 1325-1331.
ResearchGate. Web. [Last Accessed: 31 Jan 2019]
“Information and Support.” NSF, National Scoliosis Foundation,
https://www.scoliosis.org/info.php [Last Accessed: 02 Feb 2019]
Morin-Doody, Michele et al. “Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study.” Spine 25.16 (2000): 2052-2063. NCBI. Web. [Last Accessed: 02 Feb 2019]
Image Credits:
Röntgen, Wilhelm. “Hand mit Ringen (Hand with Rings).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia
Foundation Inc., 22 December 1895.
Hendriks, Eva, et al. “Regression of Breast Artery Calcification.” Cardiovascular
Imaging, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, August 2015.
http://imaging.onlinejacc.org/content/8/8/984/F1
EOS Imaging, Paris, France. A reconstructed 3D model of the full vertebrae of a
scoliosis patient based on an EOS TM 2D examination. Reproduced by Illés, Tamás in
International Orthopaedics 36.7 (2012): 1325-1331. Web. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Full-body-surface-reconstructed-3D-model-based-on-an-EOS-TM-2D-examination_fig3_221867288